Free, semi-serious and semi-fiction reading of the document presented to trade unions dall'Anfols
BACKGROUND ON THE TRUTH 'ROYAL-TORINO
a) the region gives us a lot of money as long as we go around the Piedmont to make operas
b) the stable superfondazione-Royal, for future training, explicitly states that one purpose its constitution is to make us go around the Piedmont (which is the building with the prose makes for many years)
c) with the current National Collective Bargaining Agreement, designed on the needs of theaters that are stable in the activities and only occasionally on tour , the stiffness is too large to be able to raise that much to do around the titles in the region, and instead we see in our crystal ball that will get at least four titles per year (it's our idea, we do not know if pessimistic or optimistic)
d) last but not least, remember that a year ago, when the camper, we worry a lot when a little bird told us that it was intended to redress the balance by precisely the regional theaters. Well, they started and will not stop here, and we fear that has smuggled Vergnano quest'ideona also to those foundations, and are the majority, not having the art-historical importance of key institutions such as La Scala Opera in Rome and must find a way to survive. what is the recipe-vergnano? simple: instead of focusing on quality shows at optimized costs, made the bandwagon and so they suck up resources from the local authorities.
1. Adoption of new organizational forms leading to the elimination of existing
stiffness contract and the pursuit of better conditions of
productivity, competitiveness and quality of production. Defining criteria
articulation of working in accordance with law Delia 66/20011;
Law 66 (2003 and 20011, unless it is not the law on television that has to do with us as cabbage) comes from a European directive, and among other things obliges the employer work (of any type of work) to provide 11 hours of continuous rest every 24 hours. artists is difficult for us to be a problem, at present, while it is already time for technicians, for example when they show in the evening and then the morning shift, which began for them very soon, but will become a problem for us when a large percentage of our business will shift and come home to one-two in the morning mist from the valley is now solved because the artists put aside the day after the recital, but in the long and expensive . for us to work every day while returning home late at night will make a deal that exceeds the requirement Law 66.
2. identification of new forms of employment and rethinking of existing
to ensure the optimal use of staff in accordance with the
unavoidable artistic needs of the Foundations and professionalism of
we operate;
this thing is a bit 'scary, and so that may mean a bit' all. new forms of employment, that means what? in the sense of new forms of contract? co.co.co? co.co.pro? cluck? and reconsideration of existing ones, that is, the situations are not even guaranteed? I can not believe ...
3. possible revision of the organizational criteria of the job performance of flni
a correct statement of the principles of flexibility and interchangeability of tasks ;
fungibility is a horrible word. We had to look in the dictionary. There seems to mean that the tasks must be interchangeable. flexible and interchangeable: when you sing you clean the toilets, perhaps.
4. review of existing agreements on inspections and professional
authorization for self-employed and professional ;
ie regime of terror: our professionalism will be tested whenever will deny a responsible job in our mouth, or break the Maronites as RSU, or things like that. free checking leads to blackmail. This is not bad is bad.
plus: it means "review of the arrangements for the authorization of self-employment activity? that it takes longer afford to engage in activities outside the musical theater? or if we have an activity (and probably want, given that musicians want to make music) we have, for example, thrown in at random, to give stability and to join a cooperative that is always or always dependent or independent ?
5. monitoring arrangements in place and additional company
identification of subjects and institutions can be subject to negotiation in future covenants
; business;
and should be ', we know you want to meddle with the supplements. worse, of course.
6. Institute of organic and functional review of the system of alternating'';
alternatives? this word is not in the national contract, whereas the organic functional thing that still prevents the theaters are transformed into "project-parma", or very few made in offices and all organic hired according to production.
7. practicability of the use of forms of outsourcing production
in compliance with the applicable standards of protection and attention to the need confemata optimization of production capacity internal;
here, this is a very important point and we should not make the mistake of underrating. outsourcing the work was very strictly regulated before the Biagi law, then it was almost liberalized. now, that means outsourcing ? means, for example, that we have a department-electric engineers, but to mount the audio part of our concert, for example outdoors, call an external service, ie a company or a cooperative. or, another example, we have a choir and orchestra, but to do a title of the season will call out to others. To put it bluntly, "The Nose" Shostakovich is a case of outsourcing masked from cultural exchange. outsourcing we believe is evil. Why? but because we now call the theater in St. Petersburg, which does its job for a fortnight and then go home, but tomorrow we call the choir Distocazzo cooperative and we do two cantatas by Bach and doing it by paying a pittance to work ten hours a day under the snow (they are so insecure and have no rights), while our choir is closed to make Pesio Traviata at the piano at no cost thanks to CCNL we created earlier, the day after tomorrow, by maintaining the hiring freeze for all, flesh out our choir now old and decimated by retirements through a cooperative any, maybe forever Stocazzo, maybe Staminchia, and the Nabucco both together.
8. identification of possible operational schemes in terms of
supplementary pension under the new legislative framework;
9. review of a series of regulatory institutions in contractual Ia past
application experience has shown the need for adequate review
( treatment of illness, accidents at work , rights of way for
contracts of artistic categories, change of job, travel ,
; special tools and related services, etc. ....).
the first two entries, the ones in bold are important rights. which means review of accidents at work? attention, we tend to forget about it, but the work on stage is one of the most dangerous (even if we admit that the mine and the blast furnace are worse). both we and the engineers we should, by law, always go on stage (again, testing and performances) with the yellow hard hat and safety shoes. may, of course, and the reason is obvious, but at our peril. this just as an example. there are people who burn out, burning, that is cut off a finger in carpentry, that falls from a bridge, which was crushed by a fifth; We hope that the "review of the institution of the accident" will not mean anything to the detriment of workers .... but as we suspect that yes, for some reason.
to finish: of course we review the organization of visits, no?? otherwise make the bandwagon too expensive. more than 80 euro per day, we give the coach and a sandwich and you have to also say thank you.
BACKGROUND ON THE TRUTH 'ROYAL-TORINO
a) the region gives us a lot of money as long as we go around the Piedmont to make operas
b) the stable superfondazione-Royal, for future training, explicitly states that one purpose its constitution is to make us go around the Piedmont (which is the building with the prose makes for many years)
c) with the current National Collective Bargaining Agreement, designed on the needs of theaters that are stable in the activities and only occasionally on tour , the stiffness is too large to be able to raise that much to do around the titles in the region, and instead we see in our crystal ball that will get at least four titles per year (it's our idea, we do not know if pessimistic or optimistic)
d) last but not least, remember that a year ago, when the camper, we worry a lot when a little bird told us that it was intended to redress the balance by precisely the regional theaters. Well, they started and will not stop here, and we fear that has smuggled Vergnano quest'ideona also to those foundations, and are the majority, not having the art-historical importance of key institutions such as La Scala Opera in Rome and must find a way to survive. what is the recipe-vergnano? simple: instead of focusing on quality shows at optimized costs, made the bandwagon and so they suck up resources from the local authorities.
1. Adoption of new organizational forms leading to the elimination of existing
stiffness contract and the pursuit of better conditions of
productivity, competitiveness and quality of production. Defining criteria
articulation of working in accordance with law Delia 66/20011;
Law 66 (2003 and 20011, unless it is not the law on television that has to do with us as cabbage) comes from a European directive, and among other things obliges the employer work (of any type of work) to provide 11 hours of continuous rest every 24 hours. artists is difficult for us to be a problem, at present, while it is already time for technicians, for example when they show in the evening and then the morning shift, which began for them very soon, but will become a problem for us when a large percentage of our business will shift and come home to one-two in the morning mist from the valley is now solved because the artists put aside the day after the recital, but in the long and expensive . for us to work every day while returning home late at night will make a deal that exceeds the requirement Law 66.
2. identification of new forms of employment and rethinking of existing
to ensure the optimal use of staff in accordance with the
unavoidable artistic needs of the Foundations and professionalism of
we operate;
this thing is a bit 'scary, and so that may mean a bit' all. new forms of employment, that means what? in the sense of new forms of contract? co.co.co? co.co.pro? cluck? and reconsideration of existing ones, that is, the situations are not even guaranteed? I can not believe ...
3. possible revision of the organizational criteria of the job performance of flni
a correct statement of the principles of flexibility and interchangeability of tasks ;
fungibility is a horrible word. We had to look in the dictionary. There seems to mean that the tasks must be interchangeable. flexible and interchangeable: when you sing you clean the toilets, perhaps.
4. review of existing agreements on inspections and professional
authorization for self-employed and professional ;
ie regime of terror: our professionalism will be tested whenever will deny a responsible job in our mouth, or break the Maronites as RSU, or things like that. free checking leads to blackmail. This is not bad is bad.
plus: it means "review of the arrangements for the authorization of self-employment activity? that it takes longer afford to engage in activities outside the musical theater? or if we have an activity (and probably want, given that musicians want to make music) we have, for example, thrown in at random, to give stability and to join a cooperative that is always or always dependent or independent ?
5. monitoring arrangements in place and additional company
identification of subjects and institutions can be subject to negotiation in future covenants
; business;
and should be ', we know you want to meddle with the supplements. worse, of course.
6. Institute of organic and functional review of the system of alternating'';
alternatives? this word is not in the national contract, whereas the organic functional thing that still prevents the theaters are transformed into "project-parma", or very few made in offices and all organic hired according to production.
7. practicability of the use of forms of outsourcing production
in compliance with the applicable standards of protection and attention to the need confemata optimization of production capacity internal;
here, this is a very important point and we should not make the mistake of underrating. outsourcing the work was very strictly regulated before the Biagi law, then it was almost liberalized. now, that means outsourcing ? means, for example, that we have a department-electric engineers, but to mount the audio part of our concert, for example outdoors, call an external service, ie a company or a cooperative. or, another example, we have a choir and orchestra, but to do a title of the season will call out to others. To put it bluntly, "The Nose" Shostakovich is a case of outsourcing masked from cultural exchange. outsourcing we believe is evil. Why? but because we now call the theater in St. Petersburg, which does its job for a fortnight and then go home, but tomorrow we call the choir Distocazzo cooperative and we do two cantatas by Bach and doing it by paying a pittance to work ten hours a day under the snow (they are so insecure and have no rights), while our choir is closed to make Pesio Traviata at the piano at no cost thanks to CCNL we created earlier, the day after tomorrow, by maintaining the hiring freeze for all, flesh out our choir now old and decimated by retirements through a cooperative any, maybe forever Stocazzo, maybe Staminchia, and the Nabucco both together.
8. identification of possible operational schemes in terms of
supplementary pension under the new legislative framework;
translated into Italian: it takes fuck the severance pay.
9. review of a series of regulatory institutions in contractual Ia past
application experience has shown the need for adequate review
( treatment of illness, accidents at work , rights of way for
contracts of artistic categories, change of job, travel ,
; special tools and related services, etc. ....).
the first two entries, the ones in bold are important rights. which means review of accidents at work? attention, we tend to forget about it, but the work on stage is one of the most dangerous (even if we admit that the mine and the blast furnace are worse). both we and the engineers we should, by law, always go on stage (again, testing and performances) with the yellow hard hat and safety shoes. may, of course, and the reason is obvious, but at our peril. this just as an example. there are people who burn out, burning, that is cut off a finger in carpentry, that falls from a bridge, which was crushed by a fifth; We hope that the "review of the institution of the accident" will not mean anything to the detriment of workers .... but as we suspect that yes, for some reason.
to finish: of course we review the organization of visits, no?? otherwise make the bandwagon too expensive. more than 80 euro per day, we give the coach and a sandwich and you have to also say thank you.
0 comments:
Post a Comment